EXCLUSIVE · LA QUINTA NEWS
“I wasn’t waiting. I was running for mayor.”
LA QUINTA, Riverside County, California — November 7, 2026. For Suzanne Espinoza-Jimenez, the most important moment of her first mayoral campaign came before a ballot was counted. In a written interview with California58, she described taking her newly earned high school diploma to City Hall, talking about what she might do next and deciding that local politics did not have to remain a distant ambition.
Her November 6 answers tell the story of a first-time candidate who says she collected signatures on foot, relied on Instagram and word of mouth, and entered the race while her housing situation was unsettled. She also says she intends to run again.
The election figures put that personal account in perspective: Espinoza-Jimenez is not leading the race. Her enthusiasm concerns the support she received, rather than a claim that she won.
Did Suzanne Espinoza-Jimenez win?
She is third in the current reported count, not the winner. The Riverside County official results dashboard, checked November 7, shows:
| Candidate | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Linda Evans | 7,595 | 75.78% |
| Lynne Langdon | 1,466 | 14.63% |
| Suzanne Espinoza-Jimenez | 961 | 9.59% |
These are the reported totals available at this check, not a statement that certification is complete. Evans has a substantial lead. Espinoza-Jimenez’s reference to 961 votes and 9.59% in her interview matches this snapshot.
The city’s election page identifies all three as nominated mayoral candidates. This was a single mayoral office, separate from the City Council contest. Readers can also consult our earlier La Quinta election report, whose election-night figures are an older snapshot.
A diploma, a conversation and a decision
Asked what made her run, Espinoza-Jimenez described a personal turning point rather than a party organization recruiting her or a long-established campaign operation.
“My decision to run came down to life, chance, and divine timing.”
She said she had been trying to put her life in order and become more familiar with the community. On the day she received her diploma, she recalled, she went to City Hall to show a deputy. Asked what came next, she said she might enter politics and become mayor. According to her account, she did not know an election was taking place that year until the conversation.
She also told him her housing situation was not yet stable. She said the deputy encouraged her to keep going. That conversation is her recollection; California58 has not independently verified it or identified the deputy.
“That was the moment I made up my mind: I wasn’t waiting. I was running for mayor.”
Her response places education, personal determination and encouragement at the center of why she entered public life. It does not establish a broader biographical history beyond what she shared in this interview.
Ten days walking the Cove
Espinoza-Jimenez said the hardest part of the campaign was qualifying for the ballot. She described walking around La Quinta Cove for 10 days, sometimes heading out three times a day, for roughly 54 hours of signature gathering.
The city’s election information lists nomination petitions among the required filing documents and specifies a minimum of 20 signatures. That official requirement is separate from her personal estimate of the time she spent gathering them.
What she took from the experience, she said, was the willingness of people who did not already know her to help.
“Residents taught me that even people who don’t know you will step up to help once they see you setting goals, taking action, and moving forward.”
What her “zero-dollar” campaign claim means — and what remains to be checked
Espinoza-Jimenez described her campaign as having no spending, fundraising or personal financial contributions. She said she relied on word of mouth and organic social media, with no physical lawn signs and no official campaign website.
The $0 figure is her statement, not an independently audited finding. California58 has asked whether it includes nomination or filing fees, candidate-statement charges, donated goods or services, and expenses paid by someone else, and what date the estimate covers. We also asked whether any charges were waived. No clarification had arrived when this article was prepared.
Those questions matter because the everyday description of a low-cost campaign and a complete accounting of campaign activity are not necessarily the same thing. Her answers so far describe how she says she campaigned; they do not by themselves resolve every financial-reporting question.
Gratitude for 961 votes
Espinoza-Jimenez said the preliminary support exceeded her expectations. She credited Instagram, personal conversations, community support and her faith.
“While we await the final certified results, I am just so deeply grateful for every single person who put their trust in me.”
Her interpretation is that an inexpensive, personal campaign can connect with residents. The figures establish the number of votes reported for her; they cannot establish why each voter chose her or which outreach method persuaded them.
Nor should her description of getting “this close to office” be read as a numerical assessment of the race. It expresses her sense of personal progress. The reported gap between her and the leading candidate remains large.
Giving residents a voice: the proposal and the unanswered details
Asked about her first concrete priority, she emphasized access to local decision-making for people regardless of income or background.
“In office, my focus during the first 100 days would be creating open, accessible spaces where everyday residents—regardless of income or background—have a direct voice in city decisions.”
She said this would require no added funding and proposed measuring progress through participation and greater resident involvement. She did not identify a specific meeting format, staffing arrangement, schedule or baseline against which that involvement would be measured.
California58 has asked what first action she has in mind—for example, a listening session or use of an existing public meeting—and what residents could observe to judge whether it worked. Her statement about zero added funding remains a proposal, not a verified municipal cost estimate.
Outside office, she said she plans to remain involved locally and encourage working-class residents to participate in civic life.
“I’ll be back”
In her closing answer, Espinoza-Jimenez thanked supporters and said she intends to try again.
“This was an incredible first run, and I am fully planning to do this again.”
That is a statement of intention. She did not announce a specific future election date or provide a new filing in her response.
For now, her account adds a candidate’s own explanation to the election totals: why she entered, how she says she reached residents, what she learned and what she hopes to do next. It belongs alongside scrutiny of the result and of her proposals, rather than replacing either.
About this interview: California58 invited Espinoza-Jimenez to an on-the-record written interview regardless of the election outcome. Her answers arrived November 6, 2026. Quotations are drawn from those answers; surrounding context and follow-up questions are the newsroom’s. She answered the first four topics and supplied a closing message in place of our original fifth question. Publication is not an endorsement.
Sources: Original written interview; Riverside County election results, checked November 7; City of La Quinta election and candidate information. See also our exclusive written interview with Jeff Frese.
Help this community newspaper grow
Your support helps build coverage for the people and places this local newspaper serves.
Donate once by card ↗Support La Quinta News
Choose how to support La Quinta News:
Credit / Debit Card via StripeChoose an amount from $1. One-time support through the publisher's LINKERNO Stripe account.
Continue with PayPal Continue with ZelleZelle payments go to Vitaly Ataev Troshin. Please verify the recipient in your bank before sending. Availability depends on your bank.
Optional reader support. When possible, add “La Quinta News” to the payment note. Contributions are not advertised as tax-deductible. Support does not influence editorial decisions.More from La Quinta News
- La Quinta High School Threat Investigation Finds No Credible Danger, Sheriff Says →
- La Quinta Mayor: Linda Evans Leads With 76% in Early Returns; Four Contest Council →
- La Quinta’s Burgundy Trash Carts Will Be Replaced Gradually as Standard Bin Colors Change →
- La Quinta Residents Can Schedule Home Pickup of Used Household Batteries Through Burrtec →
- La Quinta Plans Free Household Hazardous Waste Collection December 12 at City Hall →
COMMUNITY
Comments
Join the California58 conversation. You must be signed in to comment.
Create a free California58 account or sign in with an available social provider.